The item net price does not match the gross price minus the allowance
When a gross price is provided, `Item net price` (BT-146) must equal the gross price minus the amount of the allowance applied to the price.
A financial field: the expected value is computed and offered, never written into the document — the correction is the issuer's to make. Test your invoice to find out whether it is affected.
The message your validator prints
Copied verbatim from the sealed artefact: this is the exact sentence the check prints when this rule fails.
Item net price MUST equal (Gross price - Allowance amount) when gross price is provided.
Quoted from schematron-xrechnung 3.0.2, licensed under Apache-2.0.
Common searches around this code
These phrases mirror what an integrator searches for: code, syntax, rule, business field and correction.
Test your file with this error in mind
Upload the invoice involved: the report will say whether this code appears, where it appears in the document, and whether Factlint can only report it or also fix it.
To automate this check in an ERP flow, call the validation API and link every returned code to its public page.
Why this error happens
Unlike the total checks, this one grants no tolerance: the equality must hold to the cent. A percentage discount rounded on the unit price is therefore enough to trigger it.
How to fix it
Fix the calculation in the system that produced the invoice. Factlint computes the expected net price and returns it in `suggested_value`, but never writes a price.
financial_field_policy
XML correction example
<ram:GrossPriceProductTradePrice> 100.00, remise 10.00 → net déclaré 95.00
<ram:NetPriceProductTradePrice><ram:ChargeAmount>90.00</ram:ChargeAmount>