On a line, the charge reason and its code diverge
When an invoice line charge (BG-28) carries both a reason in plain text (BT-144) and a reason code (BT-145), the two must indicate the same reason.
Only the issuer holds this value: Factlint reports it and never fabricates it. Test your invoice to find out whether it is affected.
The message your validator prints
Copied verbatim from the sealed artefact: this is the exact sentence the check prints when this rule fails.
[BR-CO-08]-Invoice line charge reason code (BT-145) and Invoice line charge reason (BT-144) shall indicate the same type of charge reason.
Quoted from schematron-cen 1.3.16, licensed under EUPL-1.2.
Common searches around this code
These phrases mirror what an integrator searches for: code, syntax, rule, business field and correction.
Test your file with this error in mind
Upload the invoice involved: the report will say whether this code appears, where it appears in the document, and whether Factlint can only report it or also fix it.
To automate this check in an ERP flow, call the validation API and link every returned code to its public page.
Why this error happens
This is the previous rule's counterpart for charges. It shows up mostly on lines where a surcharge is computed by a pricing rule: the text describes the surcharge, the code describes the rule, and the two are not about the same object.
How to fix it
Align the two on the reported line, and check the pricing rule that produces them if the divergence repeats from one invoice to the next.
XML correction example
<ram:ReasonCode>ZZZ</ram:ReasonCode> <ram:Reason>Supplément carburant</ram:Reason>
<ram:ReasonCode>FC</ram:ReasonCode> <ram:Reason>Supplément carburant</ram:Reason>