Back to the error catalogue
BR-DE-31BT-91
input

Germany

The debited account identifier is missing

When the `DIRECT DEBIT` group (BG-19) is present, the `Debited account identifier` (BT-91) must be provided.

Only the issuer holds this value: Factlint reports it and never fabricates it. Test your invoice to find out whether it is affected.

The message your validator prints

Copied verbatim from the sealed artefact: this is the exact sentence the check prints when this rule fails.

[BR-DE-31] Wenn "DIRECT DEBIT" BG-19 vorhanden ist, dann muss "Debited account identifier" BT-91 übermittelt werden.

Quoted from schematron-xrechnung 3.0.2, licensed under Apache-2.0.

Common searches around this code

These phrases mirror what an integrator searches for: code, syntax, rule, business field and correction.

BR-DE-31 The debited account identifier is missingBR-DE-31 XRechnung Schematron package (KoSIT)BR-DE-31 BT-91[BR-DE-31] Wenn "DIRECT DEBIT" BG-19 vorhanden ist, dann muss "Debited account identifier" BT-91 übermittelt werden.BR-DE-31 correction

Test your file with this error in mind

Upload the invoice involved: the report will say whether this code appears, where it appears in the document, and whether Factlint can only report it or also fix it.

To automate this check in an ERP flow, call the validation API and link every returned code to its public page.

Why this error happens

The counterpart of BR-DE-30: one says who collects, the other from which account. When the account is present but wrong, BR-DE-20 reports it instead, as a warning.

How to fix it

Copy the account from the mandate your customer signed. Factlint does not write it: it is a payment detail (rule 1).

XML correction example

BEFORE (invalid)
<ram:TypeCode>59</ram:TypeCode>  <!-- ram:PayerPartyDebtorFinancialAccount/ram:IBANID absent -->
AFTER (compliant)
<ram:IBANID>DE43123456789012345678</ram:IBANID>